A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to develop their family members property. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, where by development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image that has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the site became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps have been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to be familiar with the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes past what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a relatives house in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one operates happen to be completed dependant on Expert suggestions and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Qualified backgrounds can find on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances and René Collier waded via midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality from the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal charges are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.